<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><atom:link rel="hub" href="http://tumblr.superfeedr.com/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"/><description>If the pun is the flagship of English humour, then innuendo is the seamen all over it.</description><title>CunningLinguist</title><generator>Tumblr (3.0; @cunninglinguist)</generator><link>http://cunninglinguist.tumblr.com/</link><item><title>Interesting BBC "News" Article...</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-13845025"&gt;Interesting BBC "News" Article...&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;As a man with an interest in my worldly surroundings and the happenings within, I do ponder how the BBC is able to release articles like this as if it’s legitimate news while retaining public credibility.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;However on the other end of the spectrum, I wonder how The Daily &lt;strike&gt;Fuhrer&lt;/strike&gt; Mail manages to handle quotes in the pleasant way they do to make anything sound overtly harsh. Case in point:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;‘I would have been tougher on immigrants and the workshy if it wasn’t for the Lib Dems,’&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This, to the best of my knowledge, isn’t how he worded it at all. But hey, who am I to argue with The Daily Mail. Doing so gives you cancer, or so The Daily Mail say.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To get back to the point at hand, I’m sure BBC News’s story was found riveting by the boring old fucks who are unable to change their home page from BBC News because their grandchildren won’t come over and show them how. For me, however, this article just enforced my already well established conjectures towards the current (as well as former) Prime Ministers.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Same shit; different arsehole. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If anyone from the BBC ever happens to stumble upon this, I’d like to offer an alteration to the title of the article in question based on the only pseudo-interesting information within regarding Barack Obama. How about:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;strong&gt;BLACK MAN ACHIEVES HARD TO GET PUSSY.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://cunninglinguist.tumblr.com/post/6731561159</link><guid>http://cunninglinguist.tumblr.com/post/6731561159</guid><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:55:00 -0400</pubDate><category>BBC News</category><category>Politics</category><category>Obama</category><category>David</category><category>Cameron</category><category>Barack</category><category>Larry the Cat</category></item><item><title>The low and the down.</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh hello there, welcome to my internet space!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Meaning to do this for a while now, but being a lazy procrastinator and whatnot has kinda set me back on that front. Ooops.&lt;br/&gt;So as I&amp;#8217;m sort of looking into the world of journalism as a future career, I&amp;#8217;ve been told to have a blog as a portfolio of sorts.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I probably won&amp;#8217;t be followed much, nor will I update that frequently. But hey, it&amp;#8217;s still a space to get out some ideas and publicise my idiocy online.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Peace &amp;lt;3  &lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://cunninglinguist.tumblr.com/post/6669047914</link><guid>http://cunninglinguist.tumblr.com/post/6669047914</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 19:00:04 -0400</pubDate><category>Intro</category><category>Low Down</category><category>Aaron</category><category>Crawford</category><category>AzzaCrawff</category></item></channel></rss>
